www.elawfacts.com

Archive for January, 2011

It seems that many legislators are tired of online gaming and want to stop. The issue has been ongoing for nearly a decade, and many states are very disturbed that the online gambling circumvent laws banning the game state. Senate Majority Leader Bill Deadline is very upset and said the CSPAN, Internet gambling is illegal, it’s so simple and it’s the bottom line.

Of course not alone in this move to stop playing online, because many states are upset that they are gambling, because it cuts their profits and tax revenues. States like Nevada, Mississippi, New Jersey, and are upset because many of these online gambling operations run into the sea. Indian casinos do not like either, and all were heavy campaign contributions.

The new bill has taken steps to ban the use of checks in line with credit card and electronic payment of Paris to the closure of these operations. It also becomes a national security issue is believed that some of these illegal operations of international financing terrorist enemies abroad, evidence suggesting links.

Federal officials have made some arrests very large companies from offshore sites recently running illegal Internet gambling. Most of these illegal sites operating outside the United States by criminal elements, and it is a big problem. Hopefully we can catch up with the sneaky bad guys and prevent the illegal gambling money to fund our enemies and international terrorists.

I recently received an email from a worried business owner Internet expensive, asking my opinion on an issue that could literally destroy his Internet business and affairs of several other domains involved.

He had received legal advice from a leading company and said he had to give up his rights to use its domain name web site because it contained three letters that infringed on their brand and domain name. The same company also contacted several other Internet business owners and made similar requests.

If a company records a specific brand have the ability to destroy many businesses that legitimately registered domain names? If a company that registers a trademark have a responsibility to ensure that an agency registered domain name is not domain names that may be a trademark infringement? Or an Internet business should have the responsibility to ensure a potential name does not infringe the trademark? Where does the responsibility lie?

Ultimately, the responsibility rests with the holder of the domain name as trademark law applied in the paper world also apply via the Internet.

Any company that registers a trademark has the right to protect the brand and the right to declare that the domain name does not infringe on their trademark. Why? If the domain name has the potential to confuse the public into believing that the trademark holder is somehow connected to the Web site, can lead to break against you. The courts should make the decision based on the trademark laws, and if the domain name, in fact, has the potential to confuse the public.

The domain name registrants can protect themselves as well. If you registered a domain name that does not infringe the trademarks, you may need to register the trademark. Registering a domain because the mark has not been easy, but it can be done. Even if you can not record [http://www.or]. Com, if you use the name fits the criteria of the law, can be registered. You should consult an attorney familiar with the Internet, trademark laws, and before the registration of a domain name as a trademark.

I had a painful experience last night. I went to browse the web for an article I wrote recently about optimizing search engines to see how many pick-up he had received. Unlike previous article checks, this time I used the title of the article, “The rhetoric of SEO” instead of my name as the author of Google search. As I happily examined the pickups, Most of them gave me credit as author and links to our site, I came across a forum post, used the exact title of my article and the full text of a part of it. And here’s the clincher: it was posted by a forum administrator, who presented it as his own work.

The challenge of cyber-thieves in the numbers game, pure massive volumes of material on the Internet, what are the chances that the author will find a plagiarized work? First, if you own a website or webmaster, populate your site with good content, the quality that you create yourself or pay someone to create for yourself, or use materials from public access sites. If you use this material, make sure you follow the terms of service guidelines or you can find in a lot of trouble.

Or suppose you can find more information or items you want to publish, and not in an open area, so to speak. You should contact the author of the article and ask permission to publish the article. And when you do post, you must give proper credit to the author. It’s just that simple: If you have any doubt about whether you need the permission of the author, just go ahead and apply. If you include the information on your website, such as statistics or ideas of another person, and include hardware. Some of the most used are APA (American Psychological Association), MLA (Modern Language Association) and the Chicago Manual of Style. Most colleges and universities have plenty of material to guide you through the creation of appropriate citations.

Second, if you are a contributor on the forums, mailing lists, newsgroups, etc., never, never, never someone else present words like yours. Perform three searches: one for your name, title of the article, and one of a unique string of words in the article that you put in quotes in the search box. If you believe that your work has been used without permission or credit, take immediate action by contacting the plagiarism and the site administrators. But a warning here, then angry, then you can be and believe me, I know what anger feels like, try to be polite and professional in your lap, but at the same time, to lay at your request is to have your material removed or proper credit noted.

When I discovered my work plagiarized, I immediately wrote to the person who wrote it and made a post on the forum posting plagiarism. Although I wanted to raise Cain with the site owners / administrators, I would be happy to have my work removed from the site at one of my e-mail and posting. Mary Anne Donovan is both a researcher and a practitioner, a balance that “gives me the best of both worlds. The theory behind digital communication and practical experience to know what really works and what does “She is in her tenth year as a professor of technical writing and business communication, while at the same time serves as vice President and Chief Operating Officer for American literacy SEO consultants, Inc., a consulting engine optimization research and training.

Mary Anne has worked with computers since they were first out of the closet and into more general use, starting with the computer systems of quality Kodak photographic and printing processes and now with the subtleties of the theory of optimization and to practical application.